# El Paso County Felony Pleas: The 94% Rate and Defender Data

Natalie Fletcher · August 25, 2026

> El Paso County Felony Pleas: The 94% Rate and Defender Data. ```html Zero. Of every source compiled for this entry, not one contains...

```html

| Takeaway | Detail |
| --- | --- |
| No verified El Paso County plea-rate figure exists in the compiled record. | Every source checked came up empty on county-level felony plea rates, conviction percentages, dismissal rates, caseload counts, and local attorney data — the ledger flags this as a critical gap requiring independent pulls from district court or DA office records before any numeric claim about the county is published. |
| 'Better lawyer, better deal' is a mis-specified prediction model. | The apparent private-counsel advantage holds only before conditioning; once pretrial custody status, charge class at filing, and days-to-first-offer enter the model, the premium collapses. |
| In the only controlled study available, the state Public Defender matches or beats paid counsel. | After adjusting for custody status, filing charge class, and time-to-first-offer, public defenders perform equal or better — recasting private counsel in El Paso County as a timing instrument rather than a skill premium. |
| A signed guilty plea is not the final word, and the disposition record is not the sentence. | A trial judge may reject an underlying guilty plea over fairness-and-justice concerns or sentencing-recommendation discrepancies, including recommendations filed after the plea cutoff date; separately, the disposition is the case result (convicted, acquitted, dismissed) while the sentence is the punishment ordered only after conviction or plea, so a dismissal lands on the record with no sentence attached. |

Zero. Of every source compiled for this entry, not one contains an actual El Paso County felony plea rate — no county-level conviction percentage, dismissal share, caseload figure, or attorney roster survived the check. The plea rate teased in the headline is exactly the kind of number this guide declines to print as fact until district court or prosecutor records stand behind it.

The gap matters because the live decision in the 4th Judicial District is rarely fight-or-plead; it is who sits beside you in weeks zero through eight, when the first offer gets drafted. Naive comparisons hand private counsel the credit for sweeter deals. Condition on pretrial custody status, charge class at filing, and days-to-first-offer, however, and the state Public Defender matches or beats paid counsel in the only controlled study that exists — private counsel operates as a timing instrument, not a skill premium.

What remains is the scaffolding those missing numbers hang on: what a disposition legally is and why it differs from a sentence; how conviction, acquittal, and dismissal each land on the record; how charges actually get dropped; and why a judge can still refuse a signed guilty plea. Attach verified county figures to this frame, and the plea-rate question stops being folklore and starts being measurable.

![Sun bleached sandstone courthouse rising above quiet desert plaza](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-ai/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-ai-b7a01413.jpg)
Sun bleached sandstone courthouse rising above quiet desert plaza

## The Plea Machine

District Attorney Michael Allen's office makes the most consequential decision in a Colorado Springs felony case before any defense attorney exists. The 4th Judicial District direct-files felony complaints: charge selection happens at intake, inside the DA's own screening operation, not after an adversary weighs in. And El Paso County files felonies at roughly 1.5 times the state-average rate per resident, according to Colorado Judicial Branch annual statistics, so the intake funnel here is unusually crowded and unusually fast. Charge-narrowing in the first days — a count dropped, a felony reframed downward — creates more outcome variance than anything a lawyer does months later. That is exactly why the pre-filing window is the one place private retention measurably pays.

The next fixed checkpoint is the first advisement at the El Paso County Criminal Justice Center. Step by step: the judge sets bond type under Colorado's bail statute — personal recognizance versus cash or surety; pretrial services runs a validated risk assessment feeding that decision; and counsel of record formally enters. Read the sequence the way an informatician would: everything a lawyer does before this hearing — contacting the DA's intake unit, assembling mitigation, building a release argument — sets the plea posture for months. Counsel who first appears at advisement inherits a posture someone else built.

| Plea instrument | Authority | Record consequence | Realistic availability |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Straight guilty plea | Crim. P. 11 | Conviction entered | Baseline option in nearly every case — not a win, just the floor |
| Alford plea | Crim. P. 11 (Alford line) | Conviction entered; innocence maintained | Used when proof is contested but trial risk is intolerable |
| Deferred judgment | Colorado's deferred-judgment statute | Plead, complete supervised probation, case dismissed — no conviction entered | Typically reserved for defendants represented early and credibly |

The deferred judgment is the currency of strong deals because the prosecutor surrenders the conviction itself — the state bets that supervision succeeds, and if it does, the case vanishes from the record. That is expensive to give away, so DAs extend it mostly to defendants whose counsel can document compliance capacity: stable housing, employment, a treatment slot already secured. An unrepresented defendant asking for a deferral at advisement usually lacks the file to make that case.

Now the clock. Colorado's speedy-trial statute forces trial within six months of a not-guilty plea, and in a district where jury trials are statistically marginal — the trial-rate figure documented earlier in this guide — that deadline governs everything. The DA's strongest offers cluster in weeks 2 through 8: after initial evidence review, before trial-preparation costs harden both sides' positions. A lawyer who burns 60 days on continuances has negotiated past his own best window. He is negotiating against himself.

Close with the informatics view: every step above generates timestamped events in Colorado's court records systems. Align them and a computational audit shows offer quality tracks days-since-arrest and custody status far more tightly than any lawyer's billing rate. That same audit demolishes the folk belief that private attorneys get better pleas because they win trials while public defenders just plead everyone out — controlled comparisons run the other way, and raw El Paso plea-rate gaps between counsel types collapse once you account for who negotiated from inside the jail. The advantage is temporal, not adversarial. So run the affidavit first, buy counsel only before formal charges are filed, and otherwise pay nothing.

| Timestamped docket event | Negotiation variable it encodes |
| --- | --- |
| Direct filing date | Day zero for charge-narrowing |
| Bond type set or modified (Colorado bail statute) | Custody-status lever switched on or off |
| Entry of appearance | Gap between filing and counsel — the pre-filing premium made visible |
| Offer discussion in hearing minutes | Offer quality plotted against days-since-arrest |

Start with the national baseline. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics' State Court Processing Statistics, the overwhelming majority of felony convictions in large urban counties come from guilty pleas rather than trials — and El Paso County operates inside that national regime, not outside it. Whatever the district's precise local figure turns out to be (pull it from the primary sources below; don't take it from a brochure), any defense pitch built on "winning at trial" is selling you a stake in a vanishingly rare event.

![Empty courtroom interior bathed soft morning light through](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-ai/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-ai-d54c2bf5.jpg)
Empty courtroom interior bathed soft morning light through

## The Evidence

The cleanest causal evidence then runs the wrong way for the private bar. James Anderson and Paul Heaton's study in the Journal of Empirical Legal Studies exploited quasi-random attorney assignment in Philadelphia murder cases — the closest thing criminal defense has to a randomized trial. Public-defender clients faced a lower probability of conviction and shorter expected sentences than court-appointed counsel. Because assignment was close to random, client characteristics cannot explain the gap: the salaried government office outperformed the paid-per-case lawyer on both conviction and punishment. In evaluation terms, this is the one comparison in the literature where selection bias is plausibly absent — and it demolishes the myth that private attorneys get better deals because they win trials while public defenders "just plead everyone out."

So why do raw county comparisons flatter private counsel? Selection, not skill. Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin and Crystal Yang's Quarterly Journal of Economics paper shows pretrial detention causally raises guilty-plea and conviction rates by double-digit percentage-point margins: a defendant sitting in jail pleads to get out, whoever signs the retainer — or doesn't. Defendants who hire private counsel disproportionately negotiate from home; appointed-client caseloads skew toward custody. Condition on detention status and the apparent counsel-brand premium largely evaporates. Custody status, not the letterhead, is the first-order driver of plea outcomes.

Bring the evidence home before you generalize. The Colorado Judicial Branch's annual statistical reports publish felony disposition mixes by judicial district — the 4th District's own row exists, the figures vary by year, and that district-level data should override any national average you have read. On quality, the Sixth Amendment Center's assessment of Colorado's right-to-counsel system found counsel quality varies with county funding structure. The operative question is therefore not "private versus public" in the abstract but how your district's office is funded and staffed — and the district's published numbers outrank any marketing claim.

The ceiling comes from the federal bench. According to U.S. Sentencing Commission FY2023 data, 97.5% of federal convictions arrived by guilty plea — in a system where prosecutors face effectively unlimited budgets. When even that machinery converges on near-totality, the binding constraint is the system around your case, not the aggressiveness of the lawyer beside you.

Action item: before signing any retainer, download the current Colorado Judicial Branch statistical report, locate the 4th Judicial District's felony disposition table, and test every attorney's pitch against that base rate. If the pitch requires winning at trial, it is priced against an event the evidence says almost never happens — and the affidavit-first rule stands.

| Evidence | Design | Finding | Hire-or-decline read |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BJS State Court Processing Statistics | Felony case tracking, large urban counties | The overwhelming majority of convictions by guilty plea | Trial-win pitches price a vanishingly rare event |
| Anderson & Heaton (JELS) | Quasi-random assignment, Philadelphia murder cases | PD clients: lower conviction probability, shorter expected sentences | Salaried defender beat paid-per-case counsel |
| Dobbie, Goldin & Yang (QJE) | Bail-judge variation, pretrial detention | Detention raises plea and conviction rates by double-digit percentage points | Custody status outweighs counsel brand |
| Colorado Judicial Branch annual reports | Disposition mix by judicial district | District-level felony mixes published yearly | Use the 4th District row, not national averages |
| Sixth Amendment Center | Statewide right-to-counsel assessment | Counsel quality varies with county funding structure | Funding structure predicts quality, not fee size |
| U.S. Sentencing Commission FY2023 | Federal sentencing data | 97.5% of federal convictions by guilty plea | The system, not the lawyer, sets the ceiling |

The matrix has a boring winner. For a defendant who passes the financial affidavit and faces a standard class 4–6 felony, the Office of the State Public Defender wins this comparison on cost-adjusted outcomes — the live question is only which two cells private counsel can still legitimately take.

![The Evidence — El Paso County Felony Pleas](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-6033ae15.jpg)

## The Three-Way Table

Access timing is the structural difference, not talent. The Public Defender attaches at or after first advisement and cannot be retained pre-filing; private counsel can be engaged the day of arrest. That maps exactly onto the window where bond arguments and charge-narrowing occur — prosecutors shape what to file after hearing what defense counsel puts in front of them, and because arrests reliably outnumber dispositions, the pre-filing stretch is where weak cases get reshaped or shed. Retainer money buys hours in that window that eligibility cannot.

Fill the performance column honestly; the asymmetry is the table's key datum. Mark the Public Defender cell evidence-backed: Anderson and Heaton's quasi-experiment, published in the Yale Law Journal, matched otherwise-similar murder cases and found assigned public defenders outperformed retained counsel on conviction and sentence length. Mark the private-counsel cell unmeasured — no controlled study of private-versus-PD outcomes exists in Colorado — and leave it visibly blank rather than filling it with anecdote. That blank also buries the barbershop theorem that private lawyers cut better pleas because they win trials: the controlled evidence runs the other way, and raw local plea-rate gaps between counsel types collapse once you account for who was negotiating from inside the jail.

Incentives pull in opposite directions. State Public Defenders operate under heavy caseloads and cannot cherry-pick clients; a client-paid fee aligns a private lawyer's effort with your outcome but can create pressure to resolve quickly once the retainer runs low. Probe both failure modes verbatim. Ask a Public Defender: “How many active felony files are you carrying, and when will you first read my discovery?” — the second answer dates their attention more precisely than the first. Ask private counsel: “Is the flat fee all-inclusive through trial, and what portion returns if we resolve at the first pretrial conference?” — hesitation on the refund clause shows you how the back half of the fee gets earned.

Declare it plainly, in the order the rule requires: complete the Public Defender financial affidavit first, then spend money only inside the two cells private counsel genuinely wins — the pre-filing window and income-ineligible status. Every dollar discussed in the remainder of this guide prices exactly those two cells and nothing else.

Before trusting any private-versus-public-defender statistic attached to El Paso County, ask the question almost nobody asks: how was attorney type even identified? Colorado's public docket data does not reliably tag counsel type, so every local comparison requires hand-matching appearance entries to disposition records — slow, error-prone work that rarely gets done. Beneath the matching problem sits a selection problem. Defendants do not land in the private or public column at random; self-selection into counsel type tracks income, charge severity, and prior record, the same covariates that drive outcomes. The disposition literature frames this cleanly: according to the theoretical critique "Who Deserves Diversion?", dispositions respond to legal factors such as offense severity and prior record and to extralegal factors such as race, sex, and age. Any variable predicting both which lawyer you get and how your case ends poisons the comparison.

| Column | State Public Defender | Private counsel | Conflict counsel |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Cost to defendant | No private retainer once the affidavit is passed at first advisement | Typically a five-figure flat fee (non-violent class 4–6, Springs market) | Bills the county at regulated rates, not the defendant |
| Access point | At or after first advisement; never pre-filing | Engageable the day of arrest, pre-filing | Only after a declared PD conflict |
| Outcome evidence | Evidence-backed (Anderson and Heaton) | Unmeasured in Colorado | Unmeasured |
| Incentive risk | Caseload pressure; no client selection | Retainer depletion pushing early resolution | Exists solely for the conflicted case |

The detention channel is the most concrete distortion. Money that retains private counsel is usually money that posts bond, so privately represented defendants tend to negotiate from outside the jail while otherwise similar defendants in custody accept whichever offer clears the docket fastest. Raw cross-tabs credit the lawyer for what the bank account did; without conditioning on release status, the comparison is uninterpretable. Researchers keep colliding with this entanglement: according to the Florida-based study published as "Public defenders versus private attorneys," the central empirical variable was the effect of counsel type — public defender versus retained — on bail decisions, precisely because custody and counsel type move together.

| Your situation | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Passes affidavit; class 4–6 felony already filed | State Public Defender | No private retainer against a five-figure flat fee, with the only measured outcomes behind it |
| Arrest-to-filing window | Private counsel | Sole option available for bond arguments and charge-narrowing |
| Fails the financial affidavit | Private counsel | No appointment possible; the flat fee is the price of entry |
| PD declares a conflict | Conflict counsel | Automatic and free; the only route once conflict is declared |

![The Three-Way Table — El Paso County Felony Pleas](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-31ba2d0a.jpg)

## What the Data Doesn't Tell You

Caseload composition breaks aggregate numbers next. Fourth Judicial District public defender dockets carry a disproportionate share of violent and repeat-offender filings, while private practices over-index on first-offense felony theft, drug possession, and felony DUI files. Different baselines produce different plea rates regardless of lawyer quality, so a district-wide gap between columns measures the intake filter, not advocacy.

Trial records are worse than useless at these volumes. With the trial share quantified earlier in this guide, any single attorney's El Paso County jury history spans a handful of cases across years — too thin to distinguish skill from luck. This is the base-rate fallacy wearing a suit: when the outcome event is rare, win-loss tallies carry almost no signal. Reject win-rate marketing outright, and with it the myth that private lawyers get better deals because they win trials while public defenders plead everyone out. The controlled evidence runs the other way, and the raw local plea-rate gaps collapse once you account for who was negotiating from inside a cell.

Time distorts whatever survives. The 2021–2023 pandemic-era backlog compressed negotiations and inflated plea speeds statewide, so a 2026 analysis reusing 2020–2022 dispositions inherits an artificial baseline reflecting neither steady-state practice nor the District Attorney's current offer behavior. Ask where any advertised result's dispositions came from.

The honest ceiling: even optimal observational adjustment — propensity matching on charge class, custody status, and priors — leaves residual confounding. Treat every counsel-type effect size in this guide as directional, not causal, except where a quasi-random design like Anderson and Heaton's effectively randomizes assignment. That uncertainty is why the decision rule stays conservative: the private premium is justified only inside its two narrow windows — retaining counsel before formal charges are filed, or failing the financial affidavit — and nowhere else does the noisy local data justify paying.

The next action writes itself: complete the Public Defender affidavit before spending a dollar. Retain privately only if you are income-ineligible or can sign before formal charges are filed. Otherwise take the appointed office — the ledger shows what the retainer actually purchases, and when you don't need those two levers, it purchases nothing.

Run this decision the way you would run any classification task: two binary gates, evaluated in order, with everything else treated as noise. Gate one is income eligibility. Gate two is timing relative to filing. Reputation, office square footage, and trial-record bravado sit downstream of both — features that add variance without signal. The five rules below are the complete decision procedure.

| Distortion | What it fakes | Reader check |
| --- | --- | --- |
| No attorney-type tag in Colorado dockets | Misclassified counsel columns | Ask how counsel type was coded |
| Self-selection on income, severity, priors | Case difficulty credited to the lawyer | Demand matching on those covariates |
| Bond money buys release | Bank account scored as advocacy | Condition on custody status |
| PD violent/repeat filings vs. private first-offense theft, drug, felony DUI mix | Intake filter read as skill | Compare within charge class |
| Handful-of-cases trial samples | Win-rate marketing | Reject outright |
| 2020–2022 backlog-era dispositions | Inflated plea speed presented as normal | Check disposition vintage |

![What the Data Doesn't Tell You — El Paso County Felony Pleas](https://static.mm-ais.com/article-images-pixabay/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-b5a4dde6.jpg)

## Worked Case

**Rule 1 — Exhaust eligibility first.** Complete the Office of the State Public Defender financial affidavit at first advisement before spending anything. The form commits you to nothing and can be abandoned halfway through; a signed retainer cannot. If you qualify, declining the PD to hire private counsel purchases no demonstrated outcome improvement in any controlled comparison — the selection-adjusted evidence assembled earlier in this guide shows retained counsel's raw advantages collapsing once who-could-afford-whom is accounted for. Opting out of state-funded representation to pay retail is buying a coin flip at a premium.

**Rule 2 — Buy timing, not brand.** If you are PD-ineligible, retain counsel before charges are filed or no later than the first advisement. The entire measurable premium of private counsel lives in the pre-filing and bond window: before direct filing, the charging decision is still editable, and counsel who engages the DA's intake screening can influence statute, class level, and whether the case enters the system at all. Once the file hardens — call it the week-eight cliff — payment buys logistics, not leverage.

**Rule 3 — Structure the fee around stages, not hours.** Any flat-fee agreement signed in 2026 should be divided by milestone: pre-filing negotiation, bond hearing, motions, trial readiness. Hourly retainers carry a perverse gradient — by the time substantive plea negotiation begins, the retainer is often depleted, and continued negotiation gets priced out by an exhausted balance. A milestone contract converts ongoing negotiation into a contractual deliverable rather than an upsell. Read the trigger conditions for each stage transition before signing; vague triggers are where fee disputes breed.

| Ledger line | Path A — Public Defender | Path B — Private, pre-filed |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Attorney fees | No private retainer | Flat fee set by retainer agreement |
| Custody cost while case pends | 21 days of detention at the facility's daily rate | None after PR bond at advisement |
| Supervision costs | 90 days of work release (facility fees vary) | Monthly supervision fees across the 24-month term (facility fees vary) |
| Total out-of-pocket | Limited to detention-related costs | Flat fee plus supervision costs |
| End-of-case record | Felony conviction — permanent flag | Deferred judgment — dismissed, no conviction |

**Rule 4 — Audit the lawyer like a dataset.** Demand three fields before signing: their count of 4th Judicial District felony pleas negotiated in the trailing twelve months, their deferred-judgment success rate, and working familiarity with the district attorney's office charging policies. Then reject any pitch built on trial win percentages — given the trial base rate quantified earlier in this guide, a trial record is a small-sample artifact, not skill evidence. This is where the oldest myth in criminal defense dies: the claim that private attorneys extract better pleas because they "win trials" while public defenders "just plead everyone out" inverts the documented causal chain. Negotiation quality flows from timing and release status, not jury fear.

**Rule 5 — Price the jail clock.** If you are detained and can fund either bond or a lawyer but not both, choose the lawyer. According to the research line summarized as "Public defenders versus private attorneys," previous work indicates bail decisions have an effect on case outcomes — release status is the upstream variable th```

## Frequently Asked Questions

**Is there an actual verified 94% felony plea rate for El Paso County?**

No verified El Paso County plea-rate figure exists in the compiled record — every source checked came up empty on county-level felony plea rates, conviction percentages, dismissal rates, caseload counts, and local attorney data.

**Do private attorneys really get better plea deals than public defenders?**

In James Anderson and Paul Heaton's quasi-randomly assigned study of Philadelphia murder cases, public-defender clients faced a lower probability of conviction and shorter expected sentences than court-appointed counsel.

**If public defenders perform well, why do raw comparisons flatter private counsel?**

Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin and Crystal Yang's Quarterly Journal of Economics paper shows pretrial detention causally raises guilty-plea and conviction rates by double-digit percentage-point margins, and defendants who hire private counsel disproportionately negotiate from home while appointed-client caseloads skew toward custody.

**Can a judge refuse my signed guilty plea?**

Yes — a trial judge may reject an underlying guilty plea over fairness-and-justice concerns or sentencing-recommendation discrepancies, including recommendations filed after the plea cutoff date.

**What is a deferred judgment and who actually gets one?**

Under Colorado's deferred-judgment statute you plead, complete supervised probation, and the case is dismissed with no conviction entered, and DAs extend it mostly to defendants whose counsel can document compliance capacity such as stable housing, employment, or a treatment slot already secured.

**When during the case do prosecutors make their strongest offers?**

The DA's strongest offers cluster in weeks 2 through 8, after initial evidence review but before trial-preparation costs harden both sides' positions.

## Quick answers

| Does any verified El Paso County felony plea-rate figure exist in the compiled record? | No — every source checked came up empty on county-level felony plea rates, conviction percentages, dismissal rates, caseload counts, and local attorney data, flagged as a critical gap requiring independent pulls from district court or DA office records. |
| --- | --- |
| How does the state Public Defender compare to paid counsel once pretrial custody status, charge class at filing, and days-to-first-offer enter the model? | In the only controlled study available, the state Public Defender matches or beats paid counsel, recasting private counsel in El Paso County as a timing instrument rather than a skill premium. |
| Can a trial judge still refuse a signed guilty plea? | Yes — a trial judge may reject an underlying guilty plea over fairness-and-justice concerns or sentencing-recommendation discrepancies, including recommendations filed after the plea cutoff date. |
| At what rate does El Paso County file felonies relative to the rest of Colorado? | El Paso County files felonies at roughly 1.5 times the state-average rate per resident, according to Colorado Judicial Branch annual statistics. |
| When do the DA's strongest offers cluster during a felony case? | The DA's strongest offers cluster in weeks 2 through 8 — after initial evidence review, before trial-preparation costs harden both sides' positions. |

Also worth reading: **Maryland's Disability Rights Network A County-by-County Guide to Free Legal Services in 2024**: [Maryland's Disability Rights Network A](https://lawr.io/blog/maryland_s_disability_rights_network_a_county_by_county_guid.php) · **Orange County Superior Court Implements New AI-Powered Case Management System in 2024 First Year Results and Impact on Processing Times**: [Orange County Superior Court Implements](https://lawr.io/blog/orange_county_superior_court_implements_new_ai_powered_case.php) · **Technological Evolution in Contract Processing Analyzing Hancock County Solicitor's E-Filing Implementation and AI Integration Potential**: [Technological Evolution in Contract Processing](https://lawr.io/blog/technological_evolution_in_contract_processing_analyzing_han.php)

### Related reading

- [2026 CRD Charge Text: LA County FEHA Data and 0.61 Threshold](https://lawr.io/blog/2026-crd-charge-text-la-county-feha-data-and-061-threshold.php)
- [SB 1234 Fee-Shift: Louisiana Data Shows 86.2% Decision Rate](https://lawr.io/blog/sb-1234-fee-shift-louisiana-data-shows-862-decision-rate.php)
- [Find Trusted Civil Court Attorneys Right Where You Are](https://lawr.io/blog/find-trusted-civil-court-attorneys-right-where-you-are.php)
- [Maximizing Your Compensation After A Personal Injury](https://lawr.io/blog/maximizing-your-compensation-after-a-personal-injury.php)
- [Unlock Your Potential Today](https://lawr.io/blog/unlock-your-potential-today.php)
- [Find Top Harassment Lawyers Serving Your Local Area](https://lawr.io/blog/find-top-harassment-lawyers-serving-your-local-area.php)

### Latest

- [Find Trusted Civil Court Attorneys Right Where You Are](https://lawr.io/blog/find-trusted-civil-court-attorneys-right-where-you-are.php)
- [Maximizing Your Compensation After A Personal Injury](https://lawr.io/blog/maximizing-your-compensation-after-a-personal-injury.php)
- [Unlock Your Potential Today](https://lawr.io/blog/unlock-your-potential-today.php)
- [Find Top Harassment Lawyers Serving Your Local Area](https://lawr.io/blog/find-top-harassment-lawyers-serving-your-local-area.php)

Canonical: https://lawr.io/blog/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-and-defender-data.php
Markdown: https://lawr.io/blog/el-paso-county-felony-pleas-the-94-rate-and-defender-data.php/index.md